Patient survival and tumor characteristics associated with CHEK2:p.I157T - findings from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium

Taru A Muranen, Carl Blomqvist, Thilo Dörk, Anna Jakubowska, Päivi Heikkilä, Rainer Fagerholm, Dario Greco, Kristiina Aittomäki, Stig E Bojesen, Mitul Shah, Alison M Dunning, Valerie Rhenius, Per Hall, Kamila Czene, Judith S Brand, Hatef Darabi, Jenny Chang-Claude, Anja Rudolph, Børge G Nordestgaard, Fergus J CouchSteven N Hart, Jonine Figueroa, Montserrat García-Closas, Peter A Fasching, Matthias W Beckmann, Jingmei Li, Jianjun Liu, Irene L Andrulis, Robert Winqvist, Katri Pylkäs, Arto Mannermaa, Vesa Kataja, Annika Lindblom, Sara Margolin, Jan Lubinski, Natalia Dubrowinskaja, Manjeet K Bolla, Joe Dennis, Kyriaki Michailidou, Qin Wang, Douglas F Easton, Paul D P Pharoah, Marjanka K Schmidt, Heli Nevanlinna

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: P.I157T is a CHEK2 missense mutation associated with a modest increase in breast cancer risk. Previously, another CHEK2 mutation, the protein truncating c.1100delC has been associated with poor prognosis of breast cancer patients. Here, we have investigated patient survival and characteristics of breast tumors of germ line p.I157T carriers.

METHODS: We included in the analyses 26,801 European female breast cancer patients from 15 studies participating in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium. We analyzed the association between p.I157T and the clinico-pathological breast cancer characteristics by comparing the p.I157T carrier tumors to non-carrier and c.1100delC carrier tumors. Similarly, we investigated the p.I157T associated risk of early death, breast cancer-associated death, distant metastasis, locoregional relapse and second breast cancer using Cox proportional hazards models. Additionally, we explored the p.I157T-associated genomic gene expression profile using data from breast tumors of 183 Finnish female breast cancer patients (ten p.I157T carriers) (GEO: GSE24450). Differential gene expression analysis was performed using a moderated t test. Functional enrichment was investigated using the DAVID functional annotation tool and gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA). The tumors were classified into molecular subtypes according to the St Gallen 2013 criteria and the PAM50 gene expression signature.

RESULTS: P.I157T was not associated with increased risk of early death, breast cancer-associated death or distant metastasis relapse, and there was a significant difference in prognosis associated with the two CHEK2 mutations, p.I157T and c.1100delC. Furthermore, p.I157T was associated with lobular histological type and clinico-pathological markers of good prognosis, such as ER and PR expression, low TP53 expression and low grade. Gene expression analysis suggested luminal A to be the most common subtype for p.I157T carriers and CDH1 (cadherin 1) target genes to be significantly enriched among genes, whose expression differed between p.I157T and non-carrier tumors.

CONCLUSIONS: Our analyses suggest that there are fundamental differences in breast tumors of CHEK2:p.I157T and c.1100delC carriers. The poor prognosis associated with c.1100delC cannot be generalized to other CHEK2 mutations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)98
JournalBreast Cancer Research
Volume18
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Oct 2016

Keywords

  • Amino Acid Substitution
  • Biomarkers, Tumor
  • Breast Neoplasms
  • Checkpoint Kinase 2
  • Cluster Analysis
  • Codon
  • Europe
  • Female
  • Gene Expression Profiling
  • Genetic Association Studies
  • Heterozygote
  • Humans
  • Mutation, Missense
  • Neoplasm Grading
  • Neoplasm Metastasis
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Prognosis
  • Transcriptome
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Patient survival and tumor characteristics associated with CHEK2:p.I157T - findings from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this