Abstract
This study provides evidence that peer marking can be a reliable tool for assessing laboratory reports in large cohorts. It was conducted over a 4-yr period with first-year undergraduates (∼180 students/cohort) taking a mammalian physiology course, but the procedure adopted would be applicable to any other laboratory-based discipline. The process was found to be efficient in staff time, enabling a summative practical report to be marked in
| Translated title of the contribution | Peer assessment in large undergraduate classes: an evaluation of a procedure for marking laboratory reports and a review of related practices |
|---|---|
| Original language | English |
| Pages (from-to) | 178 - 187 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Advances in Physiology Education |
| Volume | 35 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jun 2011 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Peer assessment in large undergraduate classes: an evaluation of a procedure for marking laboratory reports and a review of related practices'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver