This paper, reprinted in this Reader, offers a two accounts of the so-called Governmental model of the atonement: one 'Arminian', the other 'Calvinist'. I argue that the Calvinist version of the doctrine has more to be said for it than is sometimes thought. And I outline some areas that future discussion of this issue migtht take.
|Translated title of the contribution
|Title of host publication
|A Reader in Contemporary Philosophical Theology
|Oliver D. Crisp
|299 - 327
|Number of pages
|Published - 2009