Abstract
This paper explores the debate between perfectionists and anti-perfectionists in the context of children. It suggests that the most influential and compelling arguments in favour of anti-perfectionism are adult-centric. It does this by considering four leading reasons given in favour of anti-perfectionism and shows that none apply in the case of children. In so doing, the paper defends a perfectionist account of upbringing from the attacks made against perfectionism more generally. Furthermore, because the refutation of the various anti-perfectionist arguments are made exclusively dealing with children, the paper suggests that the perfectionist view of upbringing is compatible with anti-perfectionist restrictions on dealing with adults. This dual view combining perfectionism for children and anti-perfectionism for adults is referred to as restricted perfectionism.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Canadian Journal of Philosophy |
Early online date | 16 Jun 2014 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2014 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Perfectionism for children, anti-perfectionism for adults'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Profiles
-
Dr Timothy M Fowler
- School of Sociology, Politics and International Studies - Associate Professor
Person: Academic