Pericles’s Humming Waters: Nonhuman Agency, Textual Criticism, and the Practice of Material Ecocriticism

Laurence J W Publicover*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)
14 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Through an examination of the waters of Pericles, this essay enters a debate in ecocritical studies concerning how best to conceive and speak of nonhuman agency. Arguing that Shakespeare’s maritime scenes have a sophistication of ecological thought absent in those composed by his co-author George Wilkins, it seeks to demonstrate this point in part by scrutinizing the decisions made by modern editors of Pericles, thus illustrating how ecocriticism might benefit from engagement with textual criticism, and vice versa. The essay goes on to consider and critique claims consistently made by practitioners of material ecocriticism concerning the narrativizing potential of nonhuman agents.
Original languageEnglish
Article numberquac060
Pages (from-to)280-302
JournalShakespeare Quarterly
Volume73
Issue number3-4
Early online date12 Dec 2022
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 12 Dec 2022

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Pericles’s Humming Waters: Nonhuman Agency, Textual Criticism, and the Practice of Material Ecocriticism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this