Abstract
Despite its potential implications for the objectivity of scientific knowledge, the claim that “scientific instruments are perspectival” has received little critical attention. I show that this claim is best understood as highlighting the dependence of instruments on different perspectives. When closely analyzed, instead of constituting a novel epistemic challenge, this dependence can be exploited to mount novel strategies for resolving two old epistemic problems: conceptual relativism and theory-ladeness. The novel content of this article consists in articulating and developing these strategies by introducing two fine-grained notions of perspectives as the key units of analysis: “broad perspectives” and “narrow perspectives.”
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 521–541 |
| Number of pages | 21 |
| Journal | Philosophy of Science |
| Volume | 89 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Early online date | 12 Jan 2022 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jul 2022 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Perspectival Instruments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver