Phylogenomics: Is less more when using large-scale datasets?

D. Pisani; M.E. Rossi; F. Marlétaz; R. Feuda

doi:10.1016/j.cub.2022.11.019

Phylogenomics: Is less more when using large-scale datasets?

D. Pisani, M.E. Rossi, F. Marlétaz, R. Feuda

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article (Academic Journal)

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Phylogenetic studies have traditionally placed the simple Xenoacoelomorph worms as the sister group of all other animals with bilateral body symmetry. A new study shows that misidentification of orthologous genes might have been the source of at the least some support for this placement.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	R1340-R1342
Number of pages	3
Journal	Current Biology
Volume	32
Issue number	24
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2022.11.019
Publication status	Published - 19 Dec 2022

Bibliographical note

Keywords

Animals
Phylogeny
Invertebrates/genetics

Access to Document

10.1016/j.cub.2022.11.019Licence: Unspecified

https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10164387/ Licence: CC BY-NC-ND

Handle.net

Persistent link

Cite this

@article{aa890cab3bf741418a81f7d212acd795,

title = "Phylogenomics: Is less more when using large-scale datasets?",

abstract = "Phylogenetic studies have traditionally placed the simple Xenoacoelomorph worms as the sister group of all other animals with bilateral body symmetry. A new study shows that misidentification of orthologous genes might have been the source of at the least some support for this placement.",

keywords = "Animals, Phylogeny, Invertebrates/genetics",

author = "D. Pisani and M.E. Rossi and F. Marl{\'e}taz and R. Feuda",

year = "2022",

month = dec,

day = "19",

doi = "10.1016/j.cub.2022.11.019",

language = "English",

volume = "32",

pages = "R1340--R1342",

journal = "Current Biology",

issn = "0960-9822",