Abstract
It is often claimed that biology is autonomous from the physical sciences, but this is seldom made precise. This article makes explicit, for the first time, five distinct “autonomy of biology” theses. Three moderate theses concerning scientific status, methodological distinctness, and nonreducibility of biology to physics are correct and are nearly universally accepted. Two stronger theses, concerning the exclusivity of biological explanation and irrelevance of physical laws, are shown to be false on the basis of two case studies of physical explanations of biological phenomena. Which scales and laws are explanatorily relevant for a particular phenomenon must be decided empirically.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1128-1139 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | Philosophy of Science |
| Volume | 92 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| Early online date | 4 Sept 2025 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Dec 2025 |
Bibliographical note
© The Author(s), 2025.Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Physical Explanation and the Autonomy of Biology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver