TY - JOUR
T1 - Pilot implementation of co-designed software for co-production in mental health care planning
T2 - a qualitative evaluation of staff perspectives
AU - Farr, Michelle
AU - Pithara, Christalla
AU - Sullivan, Sarah
AU - Edwards, Hannah
AU - Hall, William
AU - Gadd, Caroline
AU - Walker, Julian
AU - Hebden, Nick
AU - Horwood, Jeremy
PY - 2019/9/3
Y1 - 2019/9/3
N2 - Background: Mental health policies advocate service user participation in care planning. However, service users often feel they’re not fully involved and direct access to users’ own electronic care plans in the community can be an obstacle. To address this, an electronic care pathway tool (CPT) was co-designed by service users, staff and software developers, to facilitate co-production of care and crisis plans.Aims: To investigate the feasibility and acceptability of the pilot implementation of the CPT in professionals’ practice to co-produce care plans and enable efficient working. Method: Qualitative interviews with fifteen mental health practitioners, and five service development/ management staff. Normalisation process theory, which outlines the social processes involved in implementing technology, and co-production theory, informed interviews and data analysis. Results: Multiple factors influenced CPT usage, including people’s views of technology, practitioners’ relationships with service users, service users’ mental health needs, and their capacity for reflective thinking. The CPT’s visual and interactive features could enable co-production of care plans. The CPT supported practitioners’ efficiency, but its features did not easily streamline with electronic patient records.Conclusions: CPT interactive touchpoints supported service users’ therapeutic reflection and facilitated care planning involvement. Information technology system interoperability was an obstacle.
AB - Background: Mental health policies advocate service user participation in care planning. However, service users often feel they’re not fully involved and direct access to users’ own electronic care plans in the community can be an obstacle. To address this, an electronic care pathway tool (CPT) was co-designed by service users, staff and software developers, to facilitate co-production of care and crisis plans.Aims: To investigate the feasibility and acceptability of the pilot implementation of the CPT in professionals’ practice to co-produce care plans and enable efficient working. Method: Qualitative interviews with fifteen mental health practitioners, and five service development/ management staff. Normalisation process theory, which outlines the social processes involved in implementing technology, and co-production theory, informed interviews and data analysis. Results: Multiple factors influenced CPT usage, including people’s views of technology, practitioners’ relationships with service users, service users’ mental health needs, and their capacity for reflective thinking. The CPT’s visual and interactive features could enable co-production of care plans. The CPT supported practitioners’ efficiency, but its features did not easily streamline with electronic patient records.Conclusions: CPT interactive touchpoints supported service users’ therapeutic reflection and facilitated care planning involvement. Information technology system interoperability was an obstacle.
KW - care planning
KW - care programme approach
KW - co-design
KW - Co-production
KW - crisis planning
KW - electronic patient records
KW - information technology
KW - mental health services
KW - normalisation process theory
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068135507&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/09638237.2019.1608925
DO - 10.1080/09638237.2019.1608925
M3 - Article (Academic Journal)
C2 - 31240971
AN - SCOPUS:85068135507
SN - 0963-8237
VL - 28
SP - 495
EP - 504
JO - Journal of Mental Health
JF - Journal of Mental Health
IS - 5
ER -