Piloting short Empathetic Refutational Interview modules in clinical training: Two UK studies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

Abstract

Objective:
Our objective was to introduce training in the Empathetic Refutational Interview (ERI), a novel framework for improving vaccine conversations and addressing vaccine misconceptions, as continuing medical education to improve HCPs’ vaccine communication confidence.

Methods:
We introduced a short-form (60-90 mins) ERI training module in two different UK clinical training settings: within a full-length immunisation training day (compared with a control communication module of the same length; Study 1) and as a stand-alone session (Study 2). We conducted a mixed-methods evaluation of training impact on participants’ vaccine communication confidence.

Results:
Participants were HCPs who attended the training (Study 1: n = 61; Study 2: n = 98). Participants significantly improved their vaccine conversations after training. Control group participants described improved knowledge of information sources as supporting their confidence, while ERI group participants described improved communication skills and techniques. Participants reported that the ERI provided a conversation structure.

Conclusion:
Short training modules can improve HCPs’ confidence in vaccine communication.

Innovation:
Our research applied an innovative new framework for vaccine communication training and produced novel insight on how this evidence-based communication structure helps HCPs gain awareness of effective vaccine communication skills, not just knowledge around signposting patients to information.
Original languageEnglish
JournalPEC Innovation
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 7 Jan 2026

Research Groups and Themes

  • TeDCog

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Piloting short Empathetic Refutational Interview modules in clinical training: Two UK studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this