Abstract
We begin with the assertion that epistemological standpoints shape – and are shaped by – ethical principles and that epistemologies of action are constantly evolving. Yet, while many contemporary planning theories are influenced by post-structural and postcolonial epistemologies that recognise the value of subjective and situated knowledge, work on planning ethics tends to retain a focus on normative ethical theories. This focus precludes further explorations of the nature and meaning of adopted ethical values. By means of a case example, we suggest that some engagement with meta-ethical questions might offer scholars of the global South-East an alternative basis for developing knowledge.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 111-129 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | Planning Theory |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Early online date | 19 Sept 2014 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 May 2016 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Planning to Change the World? Questioning the Normative Ethics of Planning Theories'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Profiles
-
Dr James Duminy
- School of Geographical Sciences - Senior Lecturer
- Bristol Poverty Institute
- Migration Mobilities Bristol
Person: Academic , Member
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver