Skip to content

Polarity and Attitude Effects in the Continued-Influence Paradigm

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Original languageEnglish
Article number104028
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Memory and Language
Volume108
Early online date6 Jun 2019
DOIs
DateAccepted/In press - 31 May 2019
DateE-pub ahead of print - 6 Jun 2019
DatePublished (current) - 1 Oct 2019

Abstract

Misinformation – information that is false or inaccurate – can continue to influence people’s memory and reasoning even after it has been corrected. Researchers have termed this the continued influence effect (CIE). However, to date, research has focused exclusively on examining the CIE in a single polarity, namely the ongoing effect of initially affirmed material that is later negated. No research has yet examined how reliance on outdated information may be affected if this polarity is reversed, that is, if initially-negated information is reinstated. It also remains unclear how participants’ pre-existing beliefs may impact the acceptance of a correction, with prior evidence showing conflicting results. To investigate these questions, across two experiments we presented participants scoring high versus low on measures of relevant attitudes with fictional news reports that contained a piece of critical attitude-relevant information. This information was either true throughout, false throughout, initially-affirmed then retracted, or initially-negated then reinstated. Participants’ reliance on the critical information was subsequently measured with the use of inferential-reasoning items. Reinstatement of initially-negated information was insufficient to bring reliance on that information to a baseline level – that is, reliance on information presented as true throughout was greater than reliance on negated and then reinstated information. This result was symmetrical with the conventional CIE observed with a reversed polarity. The effect of participants’ pre-existing attitudes on continued reliance was equivocal. The results therefore suggest that the CIE is not contingent on polarity, raising questions about the cognitive mechanisms underlying the effect.

    Research areas

  • Belief updating, Continued influence, Misinformation, Negation, Worldview

    Structured keywords

  • Memory

Documents

Documents

  • Full-text PDF (accepted author manuscript)

    Rights statement: This is the accepted author manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) is available online via Elsevier at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2019.104028 . Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.

    Accepted author manuscript, 511 KB, PDF document

    Embargo ends: 6/06/20

    Request copy

    Licence: CC BY-NC-ND

DOI

View research connections

Related faculties, schools or groups