Abstract
This article introduces this themed issue which challenges government policies and discourses using evidence from the UK 2012 Poverty and Social Exclusion Study. Policies and discourses prioritising the role of individual deficiencies and highlighting the structural problems of the welfare state in poverty causation are nothing new. However, they re-emerged vigorously in the UK following the 2007–8 global financial crisis and ensuing economic recession. The articles forming this themed issue seek to challenge in different ways this prevailing discourse. This introductory article draws upon Bacchi’s ‘what is the problem represented to be’ (‘WPR’) approach to examine the ways in which poverty was problematised by the Conservative–Liberal Democrat Coalition government (2010–15). It argues that this problematisation silenced structural processes associated with the government’s commitment to neo-liberalism, resulting in devastating, socially harmful consequences.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 3-20 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | Critical Social Policy |
| Volume | 36 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Early online date | 4 Dec 2015 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Feb 2016 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
Keywords
- Poverty and Social Exclusion
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Policies and discourses of poverty during a time of recession and austerity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Profiles
-
Professor Christina Pantazis
- School for Policy Studies - Professor of Zemiology
- Arts, Law and Social Sciences - Head of School
- Bristol Poverty Institute
Person: Academic , Member
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver