Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Policy Regarding the Sequential Lineup Is Not Informed by Probative Value but Is Informed by Receiver Operating Characteristic Analysis

John T. Wixted, Scott D. Gronlund, Laura Mickes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

It is important to determine if switching from simultaneous to sequential lineups affects response bias (the inclination to make an identification from a lineup), discriminability (the ability to distinguish between innocent and guilty suspects), or both. Measures of probative value cannot provide such information; receiver operating characteristic analysis can. Recent receiver operating characteristic analyses indicate that switching to sequential lineups both induces more conservative responding and makes it more difficult to distinguish between innocent and guilty suspects. If more conservative responding is preferred (i.e., if policymakers judge that the harm associated with the reduction of correct identifications is exceeded by the benefit associated with the reduction in false identifications), recent data indicate that this result can be achieved without a loss of discriminability by using the simultaneous lineup procedure in conjunction with a more conservative decision criterion.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)17-18
Number of pages2
JournalCurrent Directions in Psychological Science
Volume23
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2014

Keywords

  • eyewitness memory
  • signal detection theory
  • simultaneous versus sequential lineups

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Policy Regarding the Sequential Lineup Is Not Informed by Probative Value but Is Informed by Receiver Operating Characteristic Analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this