Abstract
Research programmes in the social sciences and elsewhere can be seen as ‘set-ups’
which combine inscription devices and thought styles. The history of inscription
devices without consideration of changing and often discontinuous thought styles
effectively takes the historical dimension out of the history of thought. Perhaps
thought styles are actually more important than the techniques of inscription that
arise from them.The social sciences have relied upon multiple modes of inscription,
often using, adapting or extending those invented for other purposes, such as the
census. But the strategic prioritisation and deployment of specific inscriptions in
analysis and argument has inescapably been dependent on particular thought styles;
of which by far the most significant over the course of the first half of the twentieth
century was eugenics with its specific problem of ‘population’.This paper describes
the way that Alexander Carr-Saunders took up the problem of population within
early attempts to develop sociology.We ask whether Carr-Saunders can be considered
a ‘precursor’ of a sociologist. The history of British sociology takes different
shapes – as indeed does the very idea of a history of sociology – depending on how
one answers this question.
Translated title of the contribution | Populating Sociology: Carr-Saunders and the problem of population |
---|---|
Original language | English |
Pages (from-to) | 552 - 578 |
Number of pages | 26 |
Journal | Sociological Review |
Volume | 56 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Nov 2008 |