Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Population pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of minocycline plus rifampicin in patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections caused by MRSA

  • Sonia Luque Pardos
  • , William Hope
  • , Antigone Kotsaki
  • , Shampa Das
  • , Evangelos J Giamarellos-Bourboulis
  • , Theano Kontopoulouk
  • , Karolina Akinosoglou
  • , Miriam O'Hare
  • , Marie L G Attwood
  • , Karen E Bowker
  • , Alan R Noel
  • , Andrew M Lovering
  • , Mark A J Bayliss
  • , Rebecca N Evans
  • , Alasdair P MacGowan*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article (Academic Journal) › peer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The population pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) of minocycline, rifampicin and linezolid in patients with complicated skin and soft tissue infections (cSSTIs) caused by MRSA are described.

METHODS: Samples were collected in a Phase 4 study of oral minocycline plus rifampicin versus linezolid showing minocycline plus rifampicin to be non-inferior to linezolid. Antibiotics were assayed by HPLC or LC-MS, and a population PK model was developed using Pmetrics. The association between PK/PD indices and patient outcomes was explored.

RESULTS: A three-compartment model (with an absorption compartment) with first-order input and elimination best described the data for the three drugs. No covariates were included in the final model. The population median values (95% credibility limits) of the clearance and volume of distribution were 7.412 L/h (5.121-8.361) and 14.155 L (6.799-33.901) for minocycline, 5.683 L/h (3.703-7.726) and 7.736 L (6.031-8.948) for rifampicin, and 1.970 L/h (1.326-2.499) and 20.169 L (12.857-32.629) for linezolid, respectively. Maximum a posteriori probability-Bayesian estimation plots of observed versus predicted had a slope of 0.999 r20.967 for minocycline, slope 0.998 r20.769 for rifampicin and slope 0.998 r20.895 for linezolid. PK/PD indices were not related to clinical outcome. Taking a translational minocycline fAUC24h/MIC target of >0.5 for minocycline in the presence of rifampicin, 96% (49/51) of patients reached the target.

CONCLUSIONS: Population PK models of minocycline, rifampicin and linezolid were developed in patients with MRSA cSSTI and almost all patients reached the predefined PD index targets. As a result, neither AUC, MIC nor the AUC/MIC ratio could be related to clinical outcome.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3303-3312
Number of pages10
JournalThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy
Volume79
Issue number12
Early online date16 Oct 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2024

Bibliographical note

© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact [email protected] for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact [email protected].

Keywords

  • Humans
  • Rifampin/pharmacokinetics
  • Minocycline/pharmacokinetics
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacokinetics
  • Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects
  • Male
  • Linezolid/pharmacokinetics
  • Staphylococcal Skin Infections/drug therapy
  • Microbial Sensitivity Tests
  • Young Adult
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Soft Tissue Infections/drug therapy
  • Drug Therapy, Combination

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Population pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of minocycline plus rifampicin in patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections caused by MRSA'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this