Abstract
This paper takes a critical, synoptic view of the current upsurge of populism. Populism, it is argued, has long been a feature of liberal democracies in so far as claims are made for democracy to be as directly expressive as possible of the will of its subjects. Yet populisms are hybrid in form and parasitic on existing political arrangements. What unites them is more to do with what they oppose than what they espouse. Above all, it is the norms of liberalism that are brought into question by populist proponents of direct democracy with their characteristic hostility towards elites, experts and the so-called establishment. In so far as all populisms can be dangerous this lies in the degree to which they oppose the existing norms of liberalism and seek to undermine its moderating institutions. Rather than relying on generic theories of populism to explain contemporary developments, what needs investigation is the degree to which particular populisms prioritize fear over judgement, unqualified assertion over reasoned deliberation and resentment over the moderation of power.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1-19 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | Economy and Society |
| Volume | 46 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Early online date | 15 May 2017 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 15 May 2017 |
Keywords
- populism
- liberalism
- democracy
- fear
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Populism: a deflationary view'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Profiles
-
Professor Thomas S D Osborne
- School of Sociology, Politics and International Studies - Professor of Social and Political Theory
- Cabot Institute for the Environment
Person: Academic , Member
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver