Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Postscript: More Problems With Botvinick and Plaut's (2006) PDP Model of Short-Term Memory

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Presents a postscript to the current authors' comment (see record 2009-18254-015) on the original article, "Short-term memory for serial order: A recurrent neural network model," by M. M. Botvinick and D. C. Plaut (see record 2006-04733-001). In their commentary, the current authors demonstrated that Botvinick and Plaut’s (2006) model of immediate serial recall catastrophically fails when familiar letters are tested in untrained positions within a list (Simulation 2), and a modified version of their model with a distributed letter coding scheme also fails to recall familiar (and novel) letters when tested in untrained positions (Simulation 7). That is, short-term memory (STM) did not generalize to all possible test sequences. Botvinick and Plaut rejected these claims and reported a simulation in which a new version of their model recalls familiar (and novel) items in novel positions. What Botvinick and Plaut did not emphasize, however, was that the model was trained on all the letters in all positions of the list. So, in principle, the model could recall novel syllables (and familiar syllables in untrained positions) by recalling familiar phonemes in trained positions. The current authors ran two new simulations to further highlight the generalization constraints associated with these learned conjunctive codes. (APA PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)995-997
Number of pages3
JournalPsychological Review
Volume116
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2009

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Postscript: More Problems With Botvinick and Plaut's (2006) PDP Model of Short-Term Memory'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this