Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Power, (De)Politicisation and Polycentric Governance: Evidence From UK Local Climate Policy

Timea Nochta*, Sam Warner, Louise Reardon

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

Abstract

This article extends (de)politicisation theory to elucidate power dynamics in polycentric governance. It develops an original analytical framework to empirically investigate how governmental, societal and discursive (de)politicisation processes emerge within and across decision-making centres. The framework focuses on dimensions of technocracy, pluralism, power and authority and ‘fire alarms’ and political sanctions associated with issue salience. It restores analytical focus on power asymmetries and links these asymmetries to the conditions under which polycentric governance becomes either merely formal (many centres) or substantive (centres with authority, resources, visibility and horizontal linkages). Using a longitudinal case study of climate governance in Birmingham (United Kingdom), we illustrate how waves of politicisation and depoliticisation operate to (re)distribute power with tangible implications for local climate change mitigation and net zero agendas and pathways for delivery. We conclude that delivering ‘net zero’ implies the need for deliberate strategies to strengthen substantive polycentricity in UK domestic climate policy and governance.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages16
JournalEnvironmental Policy and Governance
Early online date24 May 2026
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 24 May 2026

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 The Author(s).

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 13 - Climate Action
    SDG 13 Climate Action

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Power, (De)Politicisation and Polycentric Governance: Evidence From UK Local Climate Policy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this