Power in the courtroom: Judicial perspectives on care‐experienced girls and women in court

Claire Fitzpatrick*, Katie Hunter, Jo Staines, Julie Shaw

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

Abstract

This article focuses on rarely heard judicial perspectives, and the little explored challenges facing care‐experienced girls and women in court. Drawing on semi‐structured interviews with judges and magistrates, it reveals how the court process may be a disempowering and inadequate process for both the powerful and the powerless. Using the four elements of procedural justice as a lens to explore this – voice, trust, neutrality and respect – we highlight the immense challenges of achieving these goals for those with histories of being stigmatised and marginalised. In searching for solutions, the concept of ‘judicial rehabilitation’ enables consideration of how we might rehabilitate our systems and imagine a more hopeful approach to justice.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages17
JournalHoward Journal of Crime and Justice
Early online date26 Nov 2024
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 26 Nov 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s). The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice published by Howard League and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Research Groups and Themes

  • SPS Children and Families Research Centre

Keywords

  • girls and women
  • care‐experienced
  • judiciary
  • courts
  • power

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Power in the courtroom: Judicial perspectives on care‐experienced girls and women in court'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this