Precision of recumbent crown-heel length when using an infantometer.

Leila Cheikh Ismail*, Fabien Puglia, Eric O Ohuma, Stephen T Ash, Deborah C Bishop, Rachel M Carew, Ayesha S Al Dhaheri, Wm Cameron Chumlea

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background
Crown-heel length (CHL) measurement is influenced by technique, training, experience and subject cooperation. We investigated whether extending one or both of an infant’s legs affects the precision of CHL taken using an infantometer. The influence of staff training and infant cooperation were also examined.

Methods
CHL was measured in children (aged 2), infants (aged 1) and newborns, by extending one or both legs. The subject’s level of cooperation was recorded. Mean differences were compared using Student’s t-test; intra- and inter-observer variability were assessed using Bland-Altman plots with 95 % limits of agreement. Intra- and inter-observer technical errors of measurement (TEMs) were also calculated.

Results
Measuring CHL in newborns using only one leg resulted in significantly longer measurements. Across all groups, there was less inter-observer variability using both legs; 95 % limits of agreement were lower and TEMs smaller. Larger measurement differences were seen if children were uncooperative.

Conclusions
This study supports measuring CHL with both legs extended. The two-leg technique reduces variability and increases precision by allowing the measurer to control better the position and movements of the infant’s body.
Original languageEnglish
Article number186
Pages (from-to)186
JournalBMC Pediatrics
Volume16
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 14 Nov 2016

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Precision of recumbent crown-heel length when using an infantometer.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this