Abstract
This paper explores a number of statistical models for predicting the daily stock return volatility of an aggregate of all stocks traded on the NYSE. An application of linear and non-linear Granger causality tests highlights evidence of bidirectional causality, although the relationship is stronger from volatility to volume than the other way around. The out-of-sample forecasting performance of various linear, GARCH, EGARCH, GJR and neural network models of volatility are evaluated and compared. The models are also augmented by the addition of a measure of lagged volume to form more general ex-ante forecasting models. The results indicate that augmenting models of volatility with measures of lagged volume leads only to very modest improvements, if any, in forecasting performance.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 59-80 |
| Number of pages | 22 |
| Journal | Journal of Forecasting |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1998 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Predicting stock index volatility: can market volume help?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver