Predicting the cost of the consequences of a large nuclear accident in the UK

S. F. Ashley*, G. J. Vaughan, W. J. Nuttall, P. J. Thomas, N. A. Higgins

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)
264 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Nuclear accidents have the potential to lead to significant off-site effects that require actions to minimise the radiological impacts on people. Such countermeasures may include sheltering, evacuation, restrictions on the sale of locally-grown food, and long-term relocation of the population amongst others. Countries with nuclear facilities draw up emergency preparedness plans, and put in place such provisions as distributing instructions and iodine prophylaxis to the local population. Their plans are applied in simulated exercises on a regular basis. The costs associated with emergency preparedness and the safety provisions to reduce the likelihood of an accident, and/or mitigate the consequences, are justified on the basis of the health risks and accident costs averted. There is, of course, only limited actual experience to indicate the likely costs so that much of the costing of accidents is based on calculations. This paper reviews the methodologies used, in particular the approach that has been developed in the UK, to appraise the costs of a hypothetical nuclear accident. Results of analysing a hypothetical nuclear accident at a fictitious reactor site within the United Kingdom are discussed in relation to the accidents at Three Mile Island 2, Chernobyl and Fukushima Dai-ichi.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)96-113
Number of pages18
JournalProcess Safety and Environmental Protection
Volume112
Early online date20 Nov 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2017

Keywords

  • Chernobyl
  • Economic assessment
  • Fukushima Dai-ichi
  • Level-3 PSA
  • Nuclear power
  • Post-accident analysis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Predicting the cost of the consequences of a large nuclear accident in the UK'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this