Abstract
Examines the metarepresentational (MR) status of pretense. Three theoretical approaches for and against applying the term MR to the psychological processes involved in pretense are reviewed: A. M. Leslie's (1987) pretense as MR, J. Perner's (1988, 1991) pretense as suppositional, and P. L. Harris' (1991) pretense as a precursor of simulation. The empirical evidence from 3 domains is reviewed: normal pretend play development, normal theory of mind development, and the ability of children with autism to engage in pretense. It is argued that non-MR accounts explain individual pretense and early mutual pretense adequately and parsimoniously. Attention to the diverse nature of individual and mutual pretend play and the development of a framework for a more cognitive analysis of the developmental trends in this behavior are suggested. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2005 APA, all rights reserved).
| Translated title of the contribution | Pretend play: Is it metarepresentational? |
|---|---|
| Original language | English |
| Pages (from-to) | 445 - 468 |
| Number of pages | 24 |
| Journal | Mind and Language |
| Volume | 9 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Dec 1994 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Pretend play: Is it metarepresentational?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver