Prevent after TERFOR: why local context still matters

Therese O'Toole; Stephen H Jones; Daniel Nilsson DeHanas; Tariq Modood

Prevent after TERFOR: why local context still matters

Therese O'Toole, Stephen H Jones, Daniel Nilsson DeHanas, Tariq Modood

Research output: Book/Report › Other report

Abstract

Since Prevent was first rolled out on a national scale in 2007 its implementation has varied markedly across local contexts. The most recent policy statement on Prevent, by a specially commissioned taskforce on radicalisation which reported in December 2013, appears to want to minimize local variation by making delivery of Prevent a legal requirement. Any attempt to bypass local demographic and political variations may, however, prove to be counterproductive or even unworkable in practice.

Original language	English
Publisher	Public Spirit
Publication status	Published - 16 Dec 2013

Research Groups and Themes

SPAIS Centre for the Study of Ethnicity and Citizenship

Access to Document

http://www.publicspirit.org.uk/the-importance-of-local-context-for-preventing-extremism/

Handle.net

Persistent link

Public Spirit
O'Toole, T. (Principal Investigator), Modood, T. (Co-Principal Investigator), Jones, S. H. (Collaborator), Nilsson DeHanas, D. (Collaborator), Meer, N. (Collaborator), Woodhead, L. (Collaborator), Oldfield, E. (Collaborator) & Singleton, D. (Collaborator)
1/04/13 → 1/06/14
Project: Research

File
Muslim Participation in Contemporary Governance
O'Toole, T. (Principal Investigator), Modood, T. (Co-Principal Investigator), Jones, S. H. (Researcher), Nilsson DeHanas, D. (Researcher) & Meer, N. (Collaborator)
1/07/10 → 1/01/13
Project: Research

File

Cite this

@book{036081bfdc3c429ab2156f95e3d34525,

title = "Prevent after TERFOR: why local context still matters",

abstract = "Since Prevent was first rolled out on a national scale in 2007 its implementation has varied markedly across local contexts. The most recent policy statement on Prevent, by a specially commissioned taskforce on radicalisation which reported in December 2013, appears to want to minimize local variation by making delivery of Prevent a legal requirement. Any attempt to bypass local demographic and political variations may, however, prove to be counterproductive or even unworkable in practice. ",

author = "Therese O'Toole and Jones, {Stephen H} and {Nilsson DeHanas}, Daniel and Tariq Modood",

year = "2013",

month = dec,

day = "16",

language = "English",

publisher = "Public Spirit",

}

TY - BOOK

T1 - Prevent after TERFOR: why local context still matters

AU - O'Toole, Therese

AU - Jones, Stephen H

AU - Nilsson DeHanas, Daniel

AU - Modood, Tariq

PY - 2013/12/16

Y1 - 2013/12/16

N2 - Since Prevent was first rolled out on a national scale in 2007 its implementation has varied markedly across local contexts. The most recent policy statement on Prevent, by a specially commissioned taskforce on radicalisation which reported in December 2013, appears to want to minimize local variation by making delivery of Prevent a legal requirement. Any attempt to bypass local demographic and political variations may, however, prove to be counterproductive or even unworkable in practice.

AB - Since Prevent was first rolled out on a national scale in 2007 its implementation has varied markedly across local contexts. The most recent policy statement on Prevent, by a specially commissioned taskforce on radicalisation which reported in December 2013, appears to want to minimize local variation by making delivery of Prevent a legal requirement. Any attempt to bypass local demographic and political variations may, however, prove to be counterproductive or even unworkable in practice.

M3 - Other report

BT - Prevent after TERFOR: why local context still matters

PB - Public Spirit

ER -

Prevent after TERFOR: why local context still matters

Abstract

Research Groups and Themes

Access to Document

Handle.net

Fingerprint

Projects

Public Spirit

Muslim Participation in Contemporary Governance

Cite this