Prevent after TERFOR: why local context still matters

Therese O'Toole, Stephen H Jones, Daniel Nilsson DeHanas, Tariq Modood

Research output: Book/ReportOther report

Abstract

Since Prevent was first rolled out on a national scale in 2007 its implementation has varied markedly across local contexts. The most recent policy statement on Prevent, by a specially commissioned taskforce on radicalisation which reported in December 2013, appears to want to minimize local variation by making delivery of Prevent a legal requirement. Any attempt to bypass local demographic and political variations may, however, prove to be counterproductive or even unworkable in practice.
Original languageEnglish
PublisherPublic Spirit
Publication statusPublished - 16 Dec 2013

Research Groups and Themes

  • SPAIS Centre for the Study of Ethnicity and Citizenship

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prevent after TERFOR: why local context still matters'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
  • Public Spirit

    O'Toole, T. (Principal Investigator), Modood, T. (Co-Principal Investigator), Jones, S. H. (Collaborator), Nilsson DeHanas, D. (Collaborator), Meer, N. (Collaborator), Woodhead, L. (Collaborator), Oldfield, E. (Collaborator) & Singleton, D. (Collaborator)

    1/04/131/06/14

    Project: Research

    File
  • Muslim Participation in Contemporary Governance

    O'Toole, T. (Principal Investigator), Modood, T. (Co-Principal Investigator), Jones, S. H. (Researcher), Nilsson DeHanas, D. (Researcher) & Meer, N. (Collaborator)

    1/07/101/01/13

    Project: Research

    File

Cite this