Abstract
NTRODUCTION: Pulsed lavage during a total knee replacement usually leaves a pool of fluid on the surgical drapes. It is common practice to suck away this fluid using the same suction device used intra-operatively. This could be a cause of direct wound contamination. We hypothesised that bacteria contaminate fluid that collects around the foot in total knee replacement surgery and that suction equipment could be a portal of contamination. We also hypothesised that bacterial count in the fluid is lower if chlorhexidine, rather than saline, is used in the pulsed lavage.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty patients undergoing primary total knee replacement were divided into two groups. The first group had pulsed lavage with normal saline and the second with 0.05% chlorhexidine.
RESULTS: At the end of the operation, 20 ml of fluid, pooled on the surgical drapes was aspirated and cultured for bacterial growth. None of the fluid samples showed bacterial growth.
CONCLUSIONS: Suction device used peri-operatively during knee replacement is unlikely to be a cause of wound contamination. Pulsed lavage with normal saline is as effective as lavage with chlorhexidine.
| Translated title of the contribution | Primary total knee replacement: is suction a portal of infection? |
|---|---|
| Original language | English |
| Pages (from-to) | 224 - 225 |
| Number of pages | 2 |
| Journal | Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England |
| Volume | 91(3) |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Apr 2009 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Primary total knee replacement: is suction a portal of infection?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver