Process evaluation of a point-of-care cluster randomised trial using a computer-delivered intervention to reduce antibiotic prescribing in primary care

eCRT research team

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The study aimed to conduct a process evaluation for a cluster randomised trial of a computer-delivered, point-of-care intervention to reduce antibiotic prescribing in primary care. The study aimed to evaluate both the intervention and implementation of the trial.

METHODS: The intervention comprised a set of electronic educational and decision support tools that were remotely installed and activated during consultations with patients with acute respiratory infections over a 12 month intervention period. A mixed method evaluation was conducted with 103 general practitioners (GPs) who participated in the trial. Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with 20 GPs who had been in the intervention group of the trial and 4 members of the implementation staff. Questionnaires, consisting of both intervention evaluation and theory-based measures, were self-administered to 83 GPs (56 control group and 27 intervention group).

RESULTS: Interviews suggested that a key factor influencing GPs' use of the intervention appeared to be their awareness of the implementation of the system into their practice. GPs who were aware of the implementation of the intervention reported feeling confident in using it if they chose to and understood the purpose of the intervention screens. However, GPs who were unaware that the intervention would be appearing often reported feeling confused when they saw the messages appear on the screen and not fully understanding what they were for or how they could be used. Intervention evaluation questionnaires indicated that GPs were satisfied with the usability of the prompts, and theory-based measures revealed that intervention group GPs reported higher levels of self-efficacy in managing RTI patients according to recommended guidelines compared to GPs in the control group.

CONCLUSIONS: Remote installation of a computer-delivered intervention for use at the point-of-care was feasible and acceptable. Additional measures to promote awareness of the intervention may be required to promote health care professionals' utilisation of the intervention and these might sometimes compromise the pragmatic intention of a trial.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN47558792 (registered on 17 March 2010).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)594
JournalBMC Health Services Research
Volume14
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Dec 2014

Keywords

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use
  • Decision Making, Computer-Assisted
  • Drug Therapy, Computer-Assisted
  • Female
  • General Practitioners
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Point-of-Care Systems/standards
  • Pregnancy
  • Prescription Drug Overuse/prevention & control
  • Primary Health Care/standards
  • Respiratory Tract Infections/drug therapy
  • Surveys and Questionnaires

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Process evaluation of a point-of-care cluster randomised trial using a computer-delivered intervention to reduce antibiotic prescribing in primary care'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this