Professional Development on the Science of Learning and teachers' Performative Thinking-A Pilot Study

Paul A Howard-Jones, Tim Jay, Laura Galeano

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract


This pilot study investigated how a brief professional development session on the science of learning impacted teachers' attributions of usefulness to both scientific and performative concepts about teaching. Ratings were collected from teachers attending five events across the United Kingdom (N = 585) before and after receiving a 90-min training session. Initial ratings of scientific concepts were positively correlated with age, while initial ratings of performative concepts were negatively correlated with years of experience. Immediately following professional development, the value teachers attributed to scientific concepts for understanding their practice increased, while their valuing of performative concepts decreased. A follow-up study with a subsample (N = 153) revealed the impact was reduced but persisted 6-12 weeks later. Results are discussed in terms of the potential for a scientific understanding of learning to empower educators as expert professionals.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)267-278
Number of pages12
JournalMind, Brain, and Education
Volume14
Issue number3
Early online date19 Jul 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2020

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Professional Development on the Science of Learning and teachers' Performative Thinking-A Pilot Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this