Skip to content

Prognostic value of test(S) for O 6 -methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation for predicting overall survival in people with glioblastoma treated with temozolomide

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Original languageEnglish
Article numberCD013316
Number of pages18
JournalCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Volume2019
Issue number4
DOIs
DateAccepted/In press - 26 Feb 2019
DatePublished (current) - 30 Apr 2019

Abstract

This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (Prognosis). The objectives are as follows: Primary objective The primary objective of this review is to determine which technique (test) for assessing MGMT methylation status best predicts overall survival in people diagnosed with glioblastoma who are treated with temozolomide. We will consider each MGMT test as a separate prognostic factor. See Table 2 for the review question in population, index prognostic factor, comparator prognostic factor(s), outcome, timing, and setting (PICOTS) format. Secondary objective We will undertake a full integrated economic review to identify economic evaluations in relation to the different methods of assessing MGMT methylation status effect on overall survival. Furthermore, we will develop a simple cost-effectiveness decision model exploring the cost-effectiveness of alternative approaches to assessing MGMT methylation status. Investigation of sources of heterogeneity If we identify a sufficient number of studies for inclusion, we will examine for each technique/test whether any of the following features is best associated with overall survival. • Promoter region/ 5’-C-phosphate-G-3’ (CpG)s analysed (or the antibody used in the case of immunohistochemistry) • Cut-off used (where relevant) • Type of tumour sample (FFPE or frozen) We will also investigate the effect of population characteristics including the following. • Age • Extent of tumour resection • Karnofsky performance status • IDH status • Recurrent versus first diagnosis We are assuming constant HRs. To confirm the validity of this assumption we will investigate length of follow-up as a source of heterogeneity. If studies have started follow-up for overall survival from different timepoints, we will also investigate this as a source of heterogeneity.

    Structured keywords

  • ICEP

Documents

Documents

  • Full-text PDF (final published version)

    Rights statement: This is the final published version of the article (version of record). It first appeared online via Wiley at https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD013316/full. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.

    Final published version, 247 KB, PDF document

    Embargo ends: 30/04/20

    Request copy

  • Full-text PDF (final published version)

    Rights statement: This is the final published version of the article (version of record). It first appeared online via Wiley at https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD013316 . Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.

    Final published version, 247 KB, PDF document

    Embargo ends: 30/04/20

    Request copy

    Licence: Other

DOI

View research connections

Related faculties, schools or groups