TY - GEN
T1 - Prospects, Challenges and Injustices associated with Bioeconomy in the Amazon Region 2025
AU - Ioris, Antonio A. R.
AU - Joanoni Neto, Vitale
AU - Ritter, Camila Duarte
AU - Guzman, Tracy Devine
AU - Costa, Franklin Roberto da
AU - Lengthorn, Elena
AU - Souza, Jose Gilberto de
AU - Gallotta, Bruno
AU - Famelli, Shirley
AU - Glenk, Klaus
AU - Lima, Diogo Marcelo D. F. de
AU - Agapito, Leonardo Simões
AU - Anbleyth-Evans, Jeremy
AU - Borrmann, Theodor
AU - Flood, David
AU - Horn, Claudia
AU - Valdivieso, Natalia
AU - O’Connor, Seb
AU - Rocha, Emiliano Cabrera
AU - Schulz, Christopher
AU - Alves, José Diego Gobbo
AU - Azeredo, Eloisa Rosana de
AU - Omura, Katia Maki
AU - Nogueira, Roberta Martins
AU - Fasolin, Guilherme N.
AU - Seixas, Lucas Pinto
AU - Souza, Edison de
AU - Sandri, Cesar Augusto
N1 - © 2025 Bertram et al.
PY - 2025/11
Y1 - 2025/11
N2 - The concept of the bioeconomy is undoubtedly attractive and carries the promise of contributing to sustainable development. However, much of its practical application to date has been characterised by isolated production processes and a largely naïve, depoliticised association with environmental conservation and economic growth.-Bioeconomy has frequently been co-opted by broader political and economic interests, serving to neutralise transformative alternatives and to reinforce the hegemonic forces that drive both environmental degradation and social exclusion.-Confronting these challenges requires moving beyond mainstream environmental management and neoliberal governance, and instead positioning the bioeconomy at the centre of a politicised struggle for socio-ecological justice, one that recognises the deep interconnections between ecological preservation, socio-political equity and the environmental justice.
AB - The concept of the bioeconomy is undoubtedly attractive and carries the promise of contributing to sustainable development. However, much of its practical application to date has been characterised by isolated production processes and a largely naïve, depoliticised association with environmental conservation and economic growth.-Bioeconomy has frequently been co-opted by broader political and economic interests, serving to neutralise transformative alternatives and to reinforce the hegemonic forces that drive both environmental degradation and social exclusion.-Confronting these challenges requires moving beyond mainstream environmental management and neoliberal governance, and instead positioning the bioeconomy at the centre of a politicised struggle for socio-ecological justice, one that recognises the deep interconnections between ecological preservation, socio-political equity and the environmental justice.
U2 - 10.13140/RG.2.2.23713.06248
DO - 10.13140/RG.2.2.23713.06248
M3 - Other contribution
ER -