Skip to content

Psychiatric framing affects positive but not negative schizotypy scores in psychology and medical students

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • Christine Mohr
  • Kerry Schofield
  • Ute Leonards
  • Marc S. Wilson
  • Gina M. Grimshaw
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)85-89
Number of pages5
JournalPsychiatry Research
Volume266
Early online date12 May 2018
DOIs
DateAccepted/In press - 11 May 2018
DateE-pub ahead of print - 12 May 2018
DatePublished (current) - 1 Aug 2018

Abstract

When testing risk for psychosis, we regularly rely on self-report questionnaires. Yet, the more that people know about this condition, the more they might respond defensively, in particular with regard to the more salient positive symptom dimension. In two studies, we investigated whether framing provided by questionnaire instructions might modulate responses on self-reported positive and negative schizotypy. The O-LIFE (UK study) or SPQ (New Zealand study) questionnaire was framed in either a “psychiatric” “creativity” or “personality” (NZ only) context. We tested psychology students (without taught knowledge about psychosis) and medical students (with taught knowledge about psychosis; UK only). We observed framing effects in psychology students in both studies: positive schizotypy scores were lower after the psychiatric compared to the creativity instruction. However, schizotypy scores did not differ between the creativity and personality framing conditions, suggesting that the low scores with psychiatric framing reflect defensive responding. The same framing effect was also observed in medical students, despite their lower positive schizotypy scores overall. Negative schizotypy scores were not affected by framing in either study. These results highlight the need to reduce response biases when studying schizotypy, because these might blur schizotypy-behaviour relationships.

    Research areas

  • Framing effects, O-LIFE, Response bias, Schizotypy, Self-report questionnaires, SPQ

    Structured keywords

  • Brain and Behaviour
  • Cognitive Science
  • Visual Perception
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Clinical Neuropsychology

Download statistics

No data available

Documents

Documents

  • Full-text PDF (accepted author manuscript)

    Rights statement: This is the author accepted manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) is available online via ELSERVIER at https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016517811731884X?via%3Dihub . Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.

    Accepted author manuscript, 291 KB, PDF document

    Licence: CC BY-NC-ND

DOI

View research connections

Related faculties, schools or groups