Psychological advocacy towards healing (PATH): A randomized controlled trial of a psychological intervention in a domestic violence service setting

Gene Feder, Giulia Ferrari , Roxane Agnew-Davies, Jayne Bailey, Sandra Hollinghurst, Louise Howard , Emma Howarth, Lynnmarie Sardinha, Debbie Sharp, TJ Peters

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)

3 Citations (Scopus)
228 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background
Experience of domestic violence and abuse (DVA) is associated with mental illness. Advocacy has little effect on mental health outcomes of female DVA survivors and there is uncertainty about the effectiveness of psychological interventions for this population.

Objective
To test effectiveness of a psychological intervention delivered by advocates to DVA survivors.

Design, masking, setting, participants
Pragmatic parallel group individually randomized controlled trial of normal DVA advocacy vs. advocacy + psychological intervention. Statistician and researchers blinded to group assignment. Setting: specialist DVA agencies; two UK cities. Participants: Women aged 16 years and older accessing DVA services.

Intervention
Eight specialist psychological advocacy (SPA) sessions with two follow up sessions.

Measurements
Primary outcomes at 12 months: depression symptoms (PHQ-9) and psychological distress (CORE-OM). Primary analysis: intention to treat linear (logistic) regression model for continuous (binary) outcomes.

Results
263 women recruited (78 in shelter/refuge, 185 in community), 2 withdrew (1 community, control group; 1 intervention, refuge group), 1 was excluded from the study for protocol violation (community, control group), 130 in intervention and 130 in control groups. Recruitment ended June 2013. 12-month follow up: 64%. At 12-month follow up greater improvement in mental health of women in the intervention group. Difference in average CORE-OM score between intervention and control groups: -3.3 points (95% CI -5.5 to -1.2). Difference in average PHQ-9 score between intervention and control group: -2.2 (95% CI -4.1 to -0.3). At 12 months, 35% of the intervention group and 55% of the control group were above the CORE-OM -2clinical threshold (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.64); 29% of the intervention group and 46% of the control group were above the PHQ-9 clinical threshold (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.81),

Limitations
64% retention at 12 months

Conclusions
An eight-session psychological intervention delivered by DVA advocates produced clinically relevant improvement in mental health outcomes compared with normal advocacy care.

Trial registration
ISRCTN registry ISRCTN58561170

Original Research

3675/3750
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0205485
Number of pages17
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume13
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 27 Nov 2018

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Psychological advocacy towards healing (PATH): A randomized controlled trial of a psychological intervention in a domestic violence service setting'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Projects

    NIHR BRC Mental Health

    Gunnell, D. J.

    1/04/1731/03/22

    Project: Research, Parent

    Cite this