Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

PTCy-based haploidentical vs matched related or unrelated donor reduced-intensity conditioning transplant for DLBCL

  • Peter Dreger
  • , Anna Sureda
  • , Kwang Woo Ahn
  • , Mary Eapen
  • , Carlos Litovich
  • , Herve Finel
  • , Ariane Boumendil
  • , Ajay Gopal
  • , Alex F. Herrera
  • , Christoph Schmid
  • , José Luis Diez-Martin
  • , Ephraim Fuchs
  • , Javier Bolaños-Meade
  • , Mahasweta Gooptu
  • , Monzr M. Al Malki
  • , Luca Castagna
  • , Stefan O. Ciurea
  • , Alida Dominietto
  • , Didier Blaise
  • , Fabio Ciceri
  • Johanna Tischer, Paolo Corradini, Silvia Montoto, Stephen Robinson, Zafer Gülbas, Mehdi Hamadani

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

109 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study retrospectively compared long-term outcomes of nonmyeloablative/reduced intensity conditioning (NMC/RIC) allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) from a haploidentical family donor (haplo-HCT) using posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) with those of matched sibling donor (MSD) and matched unrelated donor (MUD) with or without T-cell depletion (TCD+/TCD-) in patients with relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Adult patients with DLBCL who had undergone their first NMC/RIC allo-HCT between 2008 and 2015 were included. Recipients of haplo-HCT were limited to those receiving graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis with PTCy. GVHD prophylaxis in MSD was limited to calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based approaches without in vivo TCD, while MUD recipients received CNI-based prophylaxis with or without TCD. Outcome analyses for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), nonrelapse mortality (NRM), and disease relapse/progression were calculated. A total of 1438 patients (haplo, 132; MSD, 525; MUD TCD+, 403; and MUD TCD-, 378) were included. Patients with haplo donors were significantly older, had a better performance status and had more frequently received total body irradiation-based conditioning regimens and bone marrow grafts than MSD and MUD TCD+ or TCD-. 3-year OS, PFS, NRM and relapse/progression incidence after haplo-HCT was 46%, 38%, 22%, and 41%, respectively, and not significantly different from outcomes of matched donor transplants on multivariate analyses. Haplo-HCT was associated with a lower cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD compared with MSD, MUD TCD+/TCD-. NMC/RIC haplo-HCT with PTCy seems to be a valuable alternative for patients with DLBCL considered for allo-HCT but lacking a matched donor.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)360-369
Number of pages10
JournalBlood Advances
Volume3
Issue number3
Early online date5 Feb 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 12 Feb 2019

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'PTCy-based haploidentical vs matched related or unrelated donor reduced-intensity conditioning transplant for DLBCL'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this