Public Space: Property, Lines, Interruptions

Antonia Layard

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

1494 Downloads (Pure)


This paper suggests that public space in England is dominated by property thinking, partially addressed by lines and could be more frequent if we create interruptions. It understands the legal production of public space not as a two-dimensional designation but instead as a process, or a series of processes: spatial, legal, material and, crucially, temporal, for creating spaces to call publics into being. While the paper agrees that property thinking limits our abilities to be in public, particularly on private land, and acknowledges that ‘lines’ including rights to roam and highways are limited, it suggests that we can – and should – create interruptions to address the growing shortage of public space. The paper argues that to do this, we need to think about time as much as space in property law. We also need to think explicitly about how, when and where we might disrupt private land uses for public use, contributing to a geography of hope.
Original languageEnglish
Article number1
Pages (from-to)1-47
Number of pages47
JournalJournal of Law, Property and Society
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2016


Dive into the research topics of 'Public Space: Property, Lines, Interruptions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this