Abstract
The English Care Bill provides for all eligible community care service users to have a personal budget - and councils were required to ensure that 70013. Almost all English authorities are experimenting with Resource Allocation Systems (RASs) as a way of calculating these budgets. This paper describes and critically analyses the nature of the RASs being used and the increasing body of case law they are attracting - in particular the Supreme Court's 2012 judgment in R (KM) Cambridgeshire County Council. The paper draws on research involving 20 local authorities concerning their use of RASs and represents the first in-depth legal examination of the claims made by proponents of the use of RASs. It challenges many of the claims made concerning such systems- in particular that they are 'more transparent', 'more equitable', 'simpler' and less discretionary than the traditional social work led community care assessment process.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 207-226 |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| Journal | Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law |
| Volume | 35 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 14 Jun 2013 |
Research Groups and Themes
- SPS Centre for Research in Health and Social Care
- SPS Health Social Care and Disability Research Centre
Keywords
- community care
- personalisation
- R (KM) Cambridgeshire County Council
- Resource Allocation Systems
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Putting the cart before the horse: resource allocation systems and community care'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver