Quantitative DNA metabarcoding reveals species composition of a macrocyclic lactone and pyrantel resistant cyathostomin population in the UK

Cyathostomins are the most abundant equid endoparasites globally. There are approximately fifty cyathostomin species and, whilst they occupy distinct niches within the large intestine, they are generally considered to share similar characteristics in terms of pathogenicity and response to drug treatment. There are three classes of anthelmintic licensed in the UK to treat cyathostomins (benzimidazoles, tetrahydropyrimidines and macrocyclic lactones) and cases of resistance have been documented for all classes. Previously, faecal egg count reduction tests (FECRT) on four UK Thoroughbred studs revealed multidrug resistant cyathostomins on one stud (A), with evidence of resistance to the macrocyclic lactones (MLs) ivermectin (IVM) and moxidectin (MOX), and to pyrantel (PYR). The remaining three studs (B-D) lacked resistance to IVM and MOX but had a shortened egg reappearance period post treatment. To determine whether specific species could be associated with the observed resistance and shortened egg reappearance period, strongyle eggs collected from between six and 15 individual horses per stud were copro-cultured to third larval stage (L3), before and after anthelmintic treatment, over a three-year timeframe (2021–2023). Quantitative DNA metabarcoding of the ITS-2 region was carried out on all samples. On stud A, single but differing species were found to be responsible for ML and pyrantel resistance in yearlings, Cyathostomum catinatum and Cylicocyclus nassatus, respectively. On studs B-D, with shortened egg reappearance periods, species composition remained largely unchanged post treatment. This study is the first to quantitatively profile cyathostomin species composition pre- and post-treatment in a multidrug resistant population in the UK, revealing that resistance in cyathostomins was species specific. This raises the question of whether these species may be responsible for ML and PYR resistance more widely and indicates that anthelmintic resistance in cyathostomins may not be a multi-species phenomenon.