Abstract
Objective: The aim of the study was to extend a previously published checklist of study design features to include study designs often used by health systems researchers and economists. Our intention is to help review authors in any field to set eligibility criteria for studies to include in a systematic review that relate directly to the intrinsic strength of the studies in inferring causality. We also seek to clarify key equivalences and differences in terminology used by different research communities.
Study design and setting: expert consensus meeting.
Results: The checklist comprises seven questions, each with a list of response items, addressing: clustering of an intervention as an aspect of allocation or due to the intrinsic nature of the delivery of the intervention; for whom, and when, outcome data are available; how the intervention effect was estimated; the principle underlying control for confounding; how groups were formed; the features of a study carried out after it was designed; the variables measured before intervention.
Conclusion: The checklist clarifies the basis of credible quasi-experimental studies, reconciling different terminology used in different fields of investigation and facilitating communications across research communities. By applying the checklist, review authors’ attention is also directed to the assumptions underpinning the methods for inferring causality.
Study design and setting: expert consensus meeting.
Results: The checklist comprises seven questions, each with a list of response items, addressing: clustering of an intervention as an aspect of allocation or due to the intrinsic nature of the delivery of the intervention; for whom, and when, outcome data are available; how the intervention effect was estimated; the principle underlying control for confounding; how groups were formed; the features of a study carried out after it was designed; the variables measured before intervention.
Conclusion: The checklist clarifies the basis of credible quasi-experimental studies, reconciling different terminology used in different fields of investigation and facilitating communications across research communities. By applying the checklist, review authors’ attention is also directed to the assumptions underpinning the methods for inferring causality.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 30-42 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | Journal of Clinical Epidemiology |
Volume | 89 |
Early online date | 25 Mar 2017 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Sept 2017 |
Research Groups and Themes
- BTC (Bristol Trials Centre)
Keywords
- health care
- health system
- evaluation
- study design
- quasi-experimental
- nonrandomized
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Quasi-experimental study designs series - paper 5: Classifying studies evaluating effects of health care or health system interventions - a taxonomy without labels'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Profiles
-
Professor Barnaby C Reeves
- Bristol Medical School (PHS) - Emeritus Professor
Person: Honorary and Visiting Academic