Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Race, Power and Urban Control: Johannesburg's Inner City Slum-yards, 1910–1923

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

From Johannesburg's origins as a mining camp, the principal and general white discourse of urban segregation for Africans was not questioned. However, no blueprint existed for how to enforce urban segregation prior to the Natives (Urban Areas) Act of 1923. Contestation over the details of how to manage African shelter in Johannesburg around the time of Union reveals that, despite powerful segregationist legislation and political consensus among the ruling white population, municipal strategies for managing African settlement were more contingent. The argument presented here is that the Council's shift in policy, from initially condoning and facilitating inner city slum yards to the subsequent vilification of the ‘African slum problem’ reflects in part a change in the balance of power between manufacturing and mining interests, and in part the reassertion of a popular white discourse connecting ‘race’ with disease, criminality and drunkenness, propagated in particular by working class ratepayers.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)615-637
JournalJournal of Southern African Studies
Volume29
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sept 2003

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 11 - Sustainable Cities and Communities
    SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Race, Power and Urban Control: Johannesburg's Inner City Slum-yards, 1910–1923'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this