Racism, ethnic density and psychological well-being through adolescence: evidence from the Determinants of Adolescent Social Well-Being and Health longitudinal study

Thomas Astell-Burt, Maria J Maynard, Erik Lenguerrand, Seeromanie Harding

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

53 Citations (Scopus)


OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of racism, own-group ethnic density, diversity and deprivation on adolescent trajectories in psychological well-being.

DESIGN: Multilevel models were used in longitudinal analysis of psychological well-being (total difficulties score (TDS) from Goodman's Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, higher scores correspond to greater difficulties) for 4782 adolescents aged 11-16 years in 51 London (U.K.) schools. Individual level variables included ethnicity, racism, gender, age, migrant generation, socio-economic circumstances, family type and indicators of family interactions (shared activities, perceived parenting). Contextual variables were per cent eligible for free school-meals, neighbourhood deprivation, per cent own-group ethnic density, and ethnic diversity.

RESULTS: Ethnic minorities were more likely to report racism than whites. Ethnic minority boys (except Indian boys) and Indian girls reported better psychological well-being throughout adolescence compared to their white peers. Notably, lowest mean TDS scores were observed for Nigerian/Ghanaian boys, among whom the reporting of racism increased with age. Adjusted for individual characteristics, psychological well-being improved with age across all ethnic groups. Racism was associated with poorer psychological well-being trajectories for all ethnic groups (p<0.001), reducing with age. For example, mean difference in TDS (95% confidence interval) between boys who experienced racism and those who did not at age 12 years=1.88 (+1.75 to +2.01); at 16 years = +1.19 (+1.07 to +1.31). Less racism was generally reported in schools and neighbourhoods with high than low own-group density. Own ethnic density and diversity were not consistently associated with TDS for any ethnic group. Living in more deprived neighbourhoods was associated with poorer psychological well-being for whites and black Caribbeans (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION: Racism, but not ethnic density and deprivation in schools or neighbourhoods, was an important influence on psychological well-being. However, exposure to racism did not explain the advantage in psychological well-being of ethnic minority groups over whites.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)71-87
Number of pages17
JournalEthnicity and Health
Issue number1-2
Publication statusPublished - 2012


  • Adaptation, Psychological
  • Adolescent
  • Age Factors
  • Child
  • Confidence Intervals
  • Cultural Diversity
  • Epidemiologic Factors
  • Ethnic Groups
  • Female
  • Great Britain
  • Humans
  • Longitudinal Studies
  • Male
  • Multivariate Analysis
  • Prejudice
  • Psychometrics
  • Questionnaires
  • Social Identification
  • Social Perception
  • Stress, Psychological


Dive into the research topics of 'Racism, ethnic density and psychological well-being through adolescence: evidence from the Determinants of Adolescent Social Well-Being and Health longitudinal study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this