Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Randomized trial of intermittent intraputamenal glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor in Parkinson's disease

  • Alan Whone*
  • , Matthias Luz
  • , Mihaela Boca
  • , Max Woolley
  • , Lucy Mooney
  • , Sonali Dharia
  • , Jack Broadfoot
  • , David Cronin
  • , Christian Schroers
  • , Neil U. Barua
  • , Lara Longpre
  • , C. Lynn Barclay
  • , Chris Boiko
  • , Greg A. Johnson
  • , H. Christian Fibiger
  • , Rob Harrison
  • , Owen Lewis
  • , Gemma Pritchard
  • , Mike Howell
  • , Charlie Irving
  • David Johnson, Suk Kinch, Christopher Marshall, Andrew D. Lawrence, Stephan Blinder, Vesna Sossi, A. Jon Stoessl, Paul Skinner, Erich Mohr, Steven S. Gill
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article (Academic Journal) › peer-review

249 Citations (Scopus)
391 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

We investigated the effects of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) in Parkinson's disease, using intermittent intraputamenal convection-enhanced delivery via a skull-mounted transcutaneous port as a novel administration paradigm to potentially afford putamen-wide therapeutic delivery. This was a single-centre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Patients were 35-75 years old, had motor symptoms for 5 or more years, and presented with moderate disease severity in the OFF state [Hoehn and Yahr stage 2-3 and Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor score (part III) (UPDRS-III) between 25 and 45] and motor fluctuations. Drug delivery devices were implanted and putamenal volume coverage was required to exceed a predefined threshold at a test infusion prior to randomization. Six pilot stage patients (randomization 2:1) and 35 primary stage patients (randomization 1:1) received bilateral intraputamenal infusions of GDNF (120 μg per putamen) or placebo every 4 weeks for 40 weeks. Efficacy analyses were based on the intention-to-treat principle and included all patients randomized. The primary outcome was the percentage change from baseline to Week 40 in the OFF state (UPDRS-III). The primary analysis was limited to primary stage patients, while further analyses included all patients from both study stages. The mean OFF state UPDRS motor score decreased by 17.3 ± 17.6% in the active group and 11.8 ± 15.8% in the placebo group (least squares mean difference: '4.9%, 95% CI: '16.9, 7.1, P = 0.41). Secondary endpoints did not show significant differences between the groups either. A post hoc analysis found nine (43%) patients in the active group but no placebo patients with a large clinically important motor improvement (≥10 points) in the OFF state (P = 0.0008). 18 F-DOPA PET imaging demonstrated a significantly increased uptake throughout the putamen only in the active group, ranging from 25% (left anterior putamen; P = 0.0009) to 100% (both posterior putamina; P < 0.0001). GDNF appeared to be well tolerated and safe, and no drug-related serious adverse events were reported. The study did not meet its primary endpoint. 18 F-DOPA imaging, however, suggested that intermittent convection-enhanced delivery of GDNF produced a putamen-wide tissue engagement effect, overcoming prior delivery limitations. Potential reasons for not proving clinical benefit at 40 weeks are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)512-525
Number of pages14
JournalBrain
Volume142
Issue number3
Early online date26 Feb 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2019

Keywords

  • convection-enhanced delivery
  • GDNF
  • glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor
  • neurorestoration
  • Parkinson's disease

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Randomized trial of intermittent intraputamenal glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor in Parkinson's disease'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this