Abstract
In this article we suggest that, notwithstanding noted differences, one unmarked similarity across psychology and mathematics education is the dominance of the view that there is a ‘normal’ path of development. We focus particularly on the case of the early learning of number and point to evidence that puts into question the dominant narrative of how number sense develops through the concrete and the cardinal. Recent neuroscience findings have raised the potential significance of ordinal approaches to learning number. We draw on empirical evidence to suggest that what children can do, and in what order, is sensitive to, among other things, the curriculum approach. We draw out implications from our work for curriculum organisation in the early years of schooling and the potential of technology to disrupt taken-for-granted paths that are embedded in pencil-and-paper technology.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 136–158 |
Number of pages | 23 |
Journal | Journal of Numerical Cognition |
Volume | 4 |
Issue number | 1 |
Early online date | 7 Jun 2018 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2018 |
Bibliographical note
Special Issue: Psychology and Mathematics Education - bridging approaches to research for understanding the learning and teaching of numberKeywords
- early number
- development
- mathematics
- teaching
- technology
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Re-thinking ‘normal’ development in the early learning of number'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Profiles
-
Professor Alf T Coles
- Centre for Higher Education Transformations
- School of Education - Professor of Mathematics Education
- Educational Futures Network
- Centre for Teaching, Learning and Curriculum
- Cabot Institute for the Environment
- Artful Narrative Inquiry Network (Ani-net)
- Mathematics Education Research Network (MERN)
Person: Academic , Member, Group lead