Abstract
We report on the state of open research data (ORD) policy and practice across UK research institutions through the STAR (Sustainable & TrAnsparent Research data) project. Through qualitative interviews, focus groups, and workshops involving 52 university staff across 21 UK institutions, we investigated the progress and challenges in ORD practices since 2016 publication of the Concordat on Open Research Data.
We observed that while institutions have made progress establishing ORD specialist roles, developing policies, and creating repository infrastructures, systematic monitoring processes and widespread adoption remain stalled. Key challenges include capacity constraints in institutional repositories, limited workload recognition, insufficient funding for long-term archiving, and varying disciplinary interpretations of ORD relevance.
Based on workshops with participants, we recommend recognition of ORD in academic career frameworks, development of disciplinary-relevant data sharing practices, improved infrastructure for monitoring ORD practices, and enhanced support for external disciplinary repositories. The study emphasizes the need for a values-driven rather than compliance-driven approach to ORD implementation, calling for deeper engagement with diverse academic communities to ensure ORD requirements remain meaningful and relevant across disciplines. These findings provide insights for research institutions and funding bodies in developing more effective and inclusive ORD policies.
We observed that while institutions have made progress establishing ORD specialist roles, developing policies, and creating repository infrastructures, systematic monitoring processes and widespread adoption remain stalled. Key challenges include capacity constraints in institutional repositories, limited workload recognition, insufficient funding for long-term archiving, and varying disciplinary interpretations of ORD relevance.
Based on workshops with participants, we recommend recognition of ORD in academic career frameworks, development of disciplinary-relevant data sharing practices, improved infrastructure for monitoring ORD practices, and enhanced support for external disciplinary repositories. The study emphasizes the need for a values-driven rather than compliance-driven approach to ORD implementation, calling for deeper engagement with diverse academic communities to ensure ORD requirements remain meaningful and relevant across disciplines. These findings provide insights for research institutions and funding bodies in developing more effective and inclusive ORD policies.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | International Journal of Digital Curation |
| Subtitle of host publication | Conference Papers |
| Pages | 9-17 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 29 Apr 2025 |
| Event | 19th International Digital Curation Conference - Madurodam, The Hague, Netherlands Duration: 17 Feb 2025 → 19 Feb 2025 https://dcc.ac.uk/events/idcc25/ |
Publication series
| Name | International Journal of Digital Curation |
|---|---|
| Publisher | Edinburgh University Library |
| Number | 1 |
| Volume | 19 |
| ISSN (Electronic) | 1746-8256 |
Conference
| Conference | 19th International Digital Curation Conference |
|---|---|
| Country/Territory | Netherlands |
| City | The Hague |
| Period | 17/02/25 → 19/02/25 |
| Internet address |
Keywords
- open data
- metaresearch
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Realising Open Data Principles In UK Research Institutions: Key insights from the STAR (Sustainable & TrAnsparent Research data) project, led by the UK Reproducibility Network (UKRN)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver