Abstract
This paper distinguishes between three methodologies for thinking about justice: principle-based, model-based and ‘realist’, concentrating mainly on the differences between the first two. Both model-based and realist approaches pride themselves on taking institutions seriously and argue that institutions make a fundamental difference to justice. This claim is at best not proven, and it may be possible to account for the difference that institutions make to what justice requires whilst retaining a non-institutional account of what justice is.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 185-199 |
Number of pages | 15 |
Journal | Journal of International Political Theory |
Volume | 12 |
Issue number | 2 |
Early online date | 2 Apr 2016 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jun 2016 |
Keywords
- justice
- ideal-theory
- non-ideal theory
- moralism
- realism
- cosmopolitanism