Recontact in clinical practice: a survey of clinical genetics services in the United Kingdom

Daniele Carrieri, Anneke M Lucassen, Angus J Clarke, Sandi Dheensa, Shane Doheny, Peter D Turnpenny, Susan E Kelly

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: To ascertain whether and how recontacting occurs in the United Kingdom.

METHOD: A Web-based survey was administered online between October 2014 and July 2015. A link to the survey was circulated via an e-mail invitation to the clinical leads of the United Kingdom's 23 clinical genetics services, with follow-up with senior clinical genetics staff.

RESULTS: The majority of UK services reported that they recontact patients and their family members. However, recontacting generally occurs in an ad hoc fashion when an unplanned event causes clinicians to review a file (a "trigger"). There are no standardized recontacting practices in the United Kingdom. More than half of the services were unsure whether formalized recontacting systems should be implemented. Some suggested greater patient involvement in the process of recontacting.

CONCLUSION: This research suggests that a thorough evaluation of the efficacy and sustainability of potential recontacting systems within the National Health Service would be necessary before deciding whether and how to implement such a service or to create guidelines on best-practice models.Genet Med 18 9, 876-881.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)876-81
Number of pages6
JournalGenetics in Medicine
Volume18
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2016

Keywords

  • Duty to Recontact
  • Genetics, Medical
  • Health Services/manpower
  • Humans
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • United Kingdom

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Recontact in clinical practice: a survey of clinical genetics services in the United Kingdom'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this