Skip to content

Reducing homelessness or re-ordering the deckchairs?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)105-128
Number of pages24
JournalModern Law Review
Issue number1
Early online date4 Jan 2019
DateAccepted/In press - 1 Sep 2018
DateE-pub ahead of print - 4 Jan 2019
DatePublished (current) - Jan 2019


The Homelessness Reduction Act 2017 has come into force trumpeting nothing less than the need for a ‘culture change’ among local housing authorities implementing it. Although it aims to reduce homelessness, it is more likely to hide long-term systemic issues in the housing system. It is argued that the 2017 Act’s significant alterations are likely to result in a re-ordering of the deckchairs on the Titanic of housing policy. Following a biography and critique of the homelessness legislation as being out of time and place, as well as a discussion of the 2017 Act itself, three central points are made: the 2017 Act has ushered in a form of neo-liberal government of the homeless; the understanding of the household seeking assistance has fundamentally altered, from passive applicant to active citizen; the private rented market provides the sole mechanism for performing the duties but remains problematic.

    Research areas

  • homelessness, neo-libralism, local government, Decision-making



  • Full-text PDF (accepted author manuscript)

    Rights statement: This is the author accepted manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) is available online via Wiley at Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.

    Accepted author manuscript, 694 KB, PDF document

    Embargo ends: 4/01/20

    Request copy


View research connections

Related faculties, schools or groups