Reducing unwarranted variation in the delivery of high quality hip fracture services in England and Wales (REDUCE): protocol for a mixed-methods study

Rita Patel; Sarah  Drew; Antony Johansen; Tim Chesser; M Kassim Javaid; Xavier L Griffin; Tim Jones; Jill Griffin; Marianne Bradshaw; Katie Whale; Estela Capelas Barbosa; Elsa Marques; Yoav Ben-Shlomo; Rachael Gooberman-Hill; Andrew Judge; Celia L Gregson

doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049763

Reducing unwarranted variation in the delivery of high quality hip fracture services in England and Wales (REDUCE): protocol for a mixed-methods study

Rita Patel, Sarah Drew, Antony Johansen, Tim Chesser, M Kassim Javaid, Xavier L Griffin, Tim Jones, Jill Griffin, Marianne Bradshaw, Katie Whale, Estela Capelas Barbosa, Elsa Marques, Yoav Ben-Shlomo, Rachael Gooberman-Hill, Andrew Judge, Celia L Gregson

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article (Academic Journal) › peer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

39 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Introduction Substantial variation in the delivery of hip fracture care, and patient outcomes persists between hospitals, despite established UK national standards and guidelines. Patients’ outcomes are partly explained by patient-level risk factors, but it is hypothesised that organisational-level factors account for the persistence of unwarranted variation in outcomes. The mixed-methods REducing unwarranted variation in the Delivery of high qUality hip fraCture services in England and Wales (REDUCE) study, aims to determine key organisational factors to target to improve patient care. Methods and analysis Quantitative analysis will assess the outcomes of patients treated at 172 hospitals in England and Wales (2016-2019) using National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD) data combined with English Hospital Episodes Statistics (HES); Patient Episode Database for Wales (PEDW); Civil Registration (deaths); and multiple organisational-level audits to characterise each service provider. Statistical analyses will identify which organisational factors explain variation in patient outcomes, and typify care pathways with high-quality consistent patient outcomes. Documentary analysis of 20 anonymised British Orthopaedic Association (BOA) hospital-initiated peer-review reports, and qualitative interviews with staff from four diverse UK hospitals providing hip fracture care, will identify barriers and facilitators to care delivery. The Covid-19 pandemic has posed a major challenge to the resilience of services and interviews will explore strategies used to adapt and innovate. This system-wide understanding will inform the development, in partnership with key national stakeholders, of an ‘Implementation Toolkit’ to inform and improve commissioning and delivery of hip fracture services. Ethics and dissemination This study was approved: quantitative study by London, City & East Research Ethics Committee (20/LO/0101); and qualitative study by Faculty of Health Sciences University of Bristol Research Ethics Committee (Ref:108284), National Health Service (NHS) Health Research Authority (20/HRA/71) and each NHS Trust provided Research and Development approval. Findings will be disseminated through scientific conferences, peer-reviewed journals, and online workshops.

Original language	English
Article number	e049763
Number of pages	10
Journal	BMJ Open
Volume	11
Issue number	5
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049763
Publication status	Published - 19 May 2021

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Competing interests None for RP, SD, XLG, TJ, JG, MB, KW, ECB, YB-S, RG-H, CLG. AJohansen is the clinical lead for the National Hip Fracture Database, in the Royal College of Physicians, London. TC is the British Orthopaedic Association (BOA) representative and sits on the board of the Falls and Fragility Fracture Audit Project (which includes the National Hip Fracture Database), he helped set up and perform many of the BOA multidisciplinary peer reviews for hip fractures, he has design and educational contracts with Stryker, Acumed and Swemac. MKJ has received honoraria, unrestricted research grants, travel and/or subsistence expenses from: Amgen, Consilient Health, Kyowa Kirin Hakin, UCB, Abbvie. EMRM has received funds for an unrelated independent study sponsored by CeramTec UK limited. AJudge has received consultancy fees from Freshfields, Bruckhaus, Derringer and Anthera Pharmaceuticals Ltd.

Funding Information:
Funding This work is funded by Versus Arthritis (reference 22086). This study is supported by the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Bristol. MKJ is supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Oxford Biomedical Research Centre (BRC). The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.

Publisher Copyright:
©

Keywords

hip
orthopaedic & trauma surgery
geriatric medicine
qualitative research

Access to Document

10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049763

Full-text PDF (final published version)
This is the final published version of the article (version of record). It first appeared online via BMJ Publishing Group at https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/5/e049763 . Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.
Final published version, 1.23 MBLicence: CC BY

Handle.net

Persistent link

Embargoed Document

Full-text PDF (author’s accepted manuscript)
Accepted author manuscript, 762 KB
Request copy

Cite this

Patel, R., Drew, S., Johansen, A., Chesser, T., Javaid, M. K., Griffin, X. L., Jones, T., Griffin, J., Bradshaw, M., Whale, K., Capelas Barbosa, E., Marques, E., Ben-Shlomo, Y., Gooberman-Hill, R., Judge, A., & Gregson, C. L. (2021). Reducing unwarranted variation in the delivery of high quality hip fracture services in England and Wales (REDUCE): protocol for a mixed-methods study. BMJ Open, 11(5), [e049763]. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049763

@article{10c8126b2da44b969fc87f896f6880fb,

title = "Reducing unwarranted variation in the delivery of high quality hip fracture services in England and Wales (REDUCE): protocol for a mixed-methods study",

abstract = "Introduction Substantial variation in the delivery of hip fracture care, and patient outcomes persists between hospitals, despite established UK national standards and guidelines. Patients{\textquoteright} outcomes are partly explained by patient-level risk factors, but it is hypothesised that organisational-level factors account for the persistence of unwarranted variation in outcomes. The mixed-methods REducing unwarranted variation in the Delivery of high qUality hip fraCture services in England and Wales (REDUCE) study, aims to determine key organisational factors to target to improve patient care. Methods and analysis Quantitative analysis will assess the outcomes of patients treated at 172 hospitals in England and Wales (2016-2019) using National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD) data combined with English Hospital Episodes Statistics (HES); Patient Episode Database for Wales (PEDW); Civil Registration (deaths); and multiple organisational-level audits to characterise each service provider. Statistical analyses will identify which organisational factors explain variation in patient outcomes, and typify care pathways with high-quality consistent patient outcomes. Documentary analysis of 20 anonymised British Orthopaedic Association (BOA) hospital-initiated peer-review reports, and qualitative interviews with staff from four diverse UK hospitals providing hip fracture care, will identify barriers and facilitators to care delivery. The Covid-19 pandemic has posed a major challenge to the resilience of services and interviews will explore strategies used to adapt and innovate. This system-wide understanding will inform the development, in partnership with key national stakeholders, of an {\textquoteleft}Implementation Toolkit{\textquoteright} to inform and improve commissioning and delivery of hip fracture services. Ethics and dissemination This study was approved: quantitative study by London, City & East Research Ethics Committee (20/LO/0101); and qualitative study by Faculty of Health Sciences University of Bristol Research Ethics Committee (Ref:108284), National Health Service (NHS) Health Research Authority (20/HRA/71) and each NHS Trust provided Research and Development approval. Findings will be disseminated through scientific conferences, peer-reviewed journals, and online workshops. ",

keywords = "hip, orthopaedic & trauma surgery, geriatric medicine, qualitative research",

author = "Rita Patel and Sarah Drew and Antony Johansen and Tim Chesser and Javaid, {M Kassim} and Griffin, {Xavier L} and Tim Jones and Jill Griffin and Marianne Bradshaw and Katie Whale and {Capelas Barbosa}, Estela and Elsa Marques and Yoav Ben-Shlomo and Rachael Gooberman-Hill and Andrew Judge and Gregson, {Celia L}",

note = "Funding Information: Competing interests None for RP, SD, XLG, TJ, JG, MB, KW, ECB, YB-S, RG-H, CLG. AJohansen is the clinical lead for the National Hip Fracture Database, in the Royal College of Physicians, London. TC is the British Orthopaedic Association (BOA) representative and sits on the board of the Falls and Fragility Fracture Audit Project (which includes the National Hip Fracture Database), he helped set up and perform many of the BOA multidisciplinary peer reviews for hip fractures, he has design and educational contracts with Stryker, Acumed and Swemac. MKJ has received honoraria, unrestricted research grants, travel and/or subsistence expenses from: Amgen, Consilient Health, Kyowa Kirin Hakin, UCB, Abbvie. EMRM has received funds for an unrelated independent study sponsored by CeramTec UK limited. AJudge has received consultancy fees from Freshfields, Bruckhaus, Derringer and Anthera Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Funding Information: Funding This work is funded by Versus Arthritis (reference 22086). This study is supported by the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Bristol. MKJ is supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Oxford Biomedical Research Centre (BRC). The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright}",

year = "2021",

month = may,

day = "19",

doi = "10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049763",

language = "English",

volume = "11",

journal = "BMJ Open",

issn = "2044-6055",

publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",

number = "5",

}

Patel, R , Drew, S, Johansen, A, Chesser, T, Javaid, MK, Griffin, XL, Jones, T, Griffin, J, Bradshaw, M, Whale, K , Capelas Barbosa, E , Marques, E , Ben-Shlomo, Y , Gooberman-Hill, R , Judge, A & Gregson, CL 2021, 'Reducing unwarranted variation in the delivery of high quality hip fracture services in England and Wales (REDUCE): protocol for a mixed-methods study', BMJ Open, vol. 11, no. 5, e049763. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049763

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reducing unwarranted variation in the delivery of high quality hip fracture services in England and Wales (REDUCE)

T2 - protocol for a mixed-methods study

AU - Patel, Rita

AU - Drew, Sarah

AU - Johansen, Antony

AU - Chesser, Tim

AU - Javaid, M Kassim

AU - Griffin, Xavier L

AU - Jones, Tim

AU - Griffin, Jill

AU - Bradshaw, Marianne

AU - Whale, Katie

AU - Capelas Barbosa, Estela

AU - Marques, Elsa

AU - Ben-Shlomo, Yoav

AU - Gooberman-Hill, Rachael

AU - Judge, Andrew

AU - Gregson, Celia L

N1 - Funding Information: Competing interests None for RP, SD, XLG, TJ, JG, MB, KW, ECB, YB-S, RG-H, CLG. AJohansen is the clinical lead for the National Hip Fracture Database, in the Royal College of Physicians, London. TC is the British Orthopaedic Association (BOA) representative and sits on the board of the Falls and Fragility Fracture Audit Project (which includes the National Hip Fracture Database), he helped set up and perform many of the BOA multidisciplinary peer reviews for hip fractures, he has design and educational contracts with Stryker, Acumed and Swemac. MKJ has received honoraria, unrestricted research grants, travel and/or subsistence expenses from: Amgen, Consilient Health, Kyowa Kirin Hakin, UCB, Abbvie. EMRM has received funds for an unrelated independent study sponsored by CeramTec UK limited. AJudge has received consultancy fees from Freshfields, Bruckhaus, Derringer and Anthera Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Funding Information: Funding This work is funded by Versus Arthritis (reference 22086). This study is supported by the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Bristol. MKJ is supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Oxford Biomedical Research Centre (BRC). The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. Publisher Copyright: ©

PY - 2021/5/19

Y1 - 2021/5/19

N2 - Introduction Substantial variation in the delivery of hip fracture care, and patient outcomes persists between hospitals, despite established UK national standards and guidelines. Patients’ outcomes are partly explained by patient-level risk factors, but it is hypothesised that organisational-level factors account for the persistence of unwarranted variation in outcomes. The mixed-methods REducing unwarranted variation in the Delivery of high qUality hip fraCture services in England and Wales (REDUCE) study, aims to determine key organisational factors to target to improve patient care. Methods and analysis Quantitative analysis will assess the outcomes of patients treated at 172 hospitals in England and Wales (2016-2019) using National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD) data combined with English Hospital Episodes Statistics (HES); Patient Episode Database for Wales (PEDW); Civil Registration (deaths); and multiple organisational-level audits to characterise each service provider. Statistical analyses will identify which organisational factors explain variation in patient outcomes, and typify care pathways with high-quality consistent patient outcomes. Documentary analysis of 20 anonymised British Orthopaedic Association (BOA) hospital-initiated peer-review reports, and qualitative interviews with staff from four diverse UK hospitals providing hip fracture care, will identify barriers and facilitators to care delivery. The Covid-19 pandemic has posed a major challenge to the resilience of services and interviews will explore strategies used to adapt and innovate. This system-wide understanding will inform the development, in partnership with key national stakeholders, of an ‘Implementation Toolkit’ to inform and improve commissioning and delivery of hip fracture services. Ethics and dissemination This study was approved: quantitative study by London, City & East Research Ethics Committee (20/LO/0101); and qualitative study by Faculty of Health Sciences University of Bristol Research Ethics Committee (Ref:108284), National Health Service (NHS) Health Research Authority (20/HRA/71) and each NHS Trust provided Research and Development approval. Findings will be disseminated through scientific conferences, peer-reviewed journals, and online workshops.

AB - Introduction Substantial variation in the delivery of hip fracture care, and patient outcomes persists between hospitals, despite established UK national standards and guidelines. Patients’ outcomes are partly explained by patient-level risk factors, but it is hypothesised that organisational-level factors account for the persistence of unwarranted variation in outcomes. The mixed-methods REducing unwarranted variation in the Delivery of high qUality hip fraCture services in England and Wales (REDUCE) study, aims to determine key organisational factors to target to improve patient care. Methods and analysis Quantitative analysis will assess the outcomes of patients treated at 172 hospitals in England and Wales (2016-2019) using National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD) data combined with English Hospital Episodes Statistics (HES); Patient Episode Database for Wales (PEDW); Civil Registration (deaths); and multiple organisational-level audits to characterise each service provider. Statistical analyses will identify which organisational factors explain variation in patient outcomes, and typify care pathways with high-quality consistent patient outcomes. Documentary analysis of 20 anonymised British Orthopaedic Association (BOA) hospital-initiated peer-review reports, and qualitative interviews with staff from four diverse UK hospitals providing hip fracture care, will identify barriers and facilitators to care delivery. The Covid-19 pandemic has posed a major challenge to the resilience of services and interviews will explore strategies used to adapt and innovate. This system-wide understanding will inform the development, in partnership with key national stakeholders, of an ‘Implementation Toolkit’ to inform and improve commissioning and delivery of hip fracture services. Ethics and dissemination This study was approved: quantitative study by London, City & East Research Ethics Committee (20/LO/0101); and qualitative study by Faculty of Health Sciences University of Bristol Research Ethics Committee (Ref:108284), National Health Service (NHS) Health Research Authority (20/HRA/71) and each NHS Trust provided Research and Development approval. Findings will be disseminated through scientific conferences, peer-reviewed journals, and online workshops.

KW - hip

KW - orthopaedic & trauma surgery

KW - geriatric medicine

KW - qualitative research

U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049763

DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049763

M3 - Article (Academic Journal)

C2 - 34011603

SN - 2044-6055

VL - 11

JO - BMJ Open

JF - BMJ Open

IS - 5

M1 - e049763

ER -

Reducing unwarranted variation in the delivery of high quality hip fracture services in England and Wales (REDUCE): protocol for a mixed-methods study

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Keywords

Access to Document

Handle.net

Embargoed Document

Fingerprint

Cite this