Reframing the science and policy of nicotine, illegal drugs and alcohol - conclusions of the ALICE RAP Project

Peter Anderson, Virginia Berridge, Patricia Conrod, Robert Dudley, Matilda Hellman, Dirk Lachenmeier, Anne Lingford-Hughes, David Miller, Jürgen Rehm, Robin Room, Laura Schmidt, Roger Sullivan, Tamyko Ysa, Antoni Gual

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)

3 Citations (Scopus)
80 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In 2013, illegal drug use was responsible for 1.8% of years of life lost in the European Union, alcohol was responsible for 8.2% and tobacco for 18.2%, imposing economic burdens in excess of 2.5% of GDP. No single European country has optimal governance structures for reducing the harm done by nicotine, illegal drugs and alcohol, and existing ones are poorly designed, fragmented, and sometimes cause harm. Reporting the main science and policy conclusions of a transdisciplinary five-year analysis of the place of addictions in Europe, researchers from 67 scientific institutions addressed these problems by reframing an understanding of addictions. A new paradigm needs to account for evolutionary evidence which suggests that humans are biologically predisposed to seek out drugs, and that, today, individuals face availability of high drug doses, consequently increasing the risk of harm. New definitions need to acknowledge that the defining element of addictive drugs is "heavy use over time", a concept that could replace the diagnostic artefact captured by the clinical term "substance use disorder", thus opening the door for new substances to be considered such as sugar. Tools of quantitative risk assessment that recognize drugs as toxins could be further deployed to assess regulatory approaches to reducing harm. Re-designed governance of drugs requires embedding policy within a comprehensive societal well-being frame that encompasses a range of domains of well-being, including quality of life, material living conditions and sustainability over time; such a frame adds arguments to the inappropriateness of policies that criminalize individuals for using drugs and that continue to categorize certain drugs as illegal. A health footprint, modelled on the carbon footprint, and using quantitative measures such as years of life lost due to death or disability, could serve as the accountability tool that apportions responsibility for who and what causes drug-related harm.
Original languageEnglish
JournalF1000Research
Volume6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17 Mar 2017

Keywords

  • Alcohol, Evolutionary biology, Governance, Health footprint, Illegal drugs, Margins of exposure, Nicotine, Well-being

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Reframing the science and policy of nicotine, illegal drugs and alcohol - conclusions of the ALICE RAP Project'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Anderson, P., Berridge, V., Conrod, P., Dudley, R., Hellman, M., Lachenmeier, D., Lingford-Hughes, A., Miller, D., Rehm, J., Room, R., Schmidt, L., Sullivan, R., Ysa, T., & Gual, A. (2017). Reframing the science and policy of nicotine, illegal drugs and alcohol - conclusions of the ALICE RAP Project. F1000Research, 6. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.10860.1