An alternative judgment in the 1970s Court of Appeal case of R v Stone and Dobinson. The text draws upon care ethics, narrative theory as well as fact construction skills and the techniques of precedent to present a fictitious dissenting judgment.
|Translated title of the contribution||R v Stone and Dobinson: Judgement|
|Title of host publication||Feminist Judgments: From Theory to Practice|
|Editors||Hunter McGlynn Rackley|
|Number of pages||7|
|Publication status||Published - 2010|