Abstract
An alternative judgment in the 1970s Court of Appeal case of R v Stone and Dobinson. The text draws upon care ethics, narrative theory as well as fact construction skills and the techniques of precedent to present a fictitious dissenting judgment.
| Translated title of the contribution | R v Stone and Dobinson: Judgement |
|---|---|
| Original language | English |
| Title of host publication | Feminist Judgments: From Theory to Practice |
| Editors | Hunter McGlynn Rackley |
| Publisher | Hart Publishing |
| Pages | 234-240 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781849460538 |
| Publication status | Published - 2010 |
Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Regina v Stone. Regina v Dobinson'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Cite this
Bibbings, L. S. (2010). Regina v Stone. Regina v Dobinson. In H. M. Rackley (Ed.), Feminist Judgments: From Theory to Practice (pp. 234-240). Hart Publishing. http://www.hartpub.co.uk/BookDetails.aspx?ISBN=9781849460538