Registration and publication of emergency and elective randomised controlled trials in surgery: A cohort study from trial registries

Rachael L. Morley*, Matthew J. Edmondson, Ceri Rowlands, Jane M. Blazeby, Robert J. Hinchliffe

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)
255 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objectives Emergency surgical practice constitutes 50% of the workload for surgeons, but there is a lack of high quality randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in emergency surgery. This study aims to establish the differences between the registration, completion and publication of emergency and elective surgical trials.

Design The clinicaltrials.gov and ISRCTN.com trials registry databases were searched for RCTs between 12 July 2010 and 12 July 2012 using the keyword ‘surgery’. Publications were systematically searched for in Pubmed, MEDLINE and EMBASE.

Participants Results with no surgical interventions were excluded. The remaining results were manually categorised into ‘emergency’ or ‘elective’ and ‘surgical’ or ‘adjunct’ by two reviewers.

Primary outcome measures Number of RCTs registered in emergency versus elective surgery.

Secondary outcome measures Number of RCTs published in emergency versus elective surgery; reasons why trials remain unpublished; funding, sponsorship and impact of published articles; number of adjunct trials registered in emergency and elective surgery.

Results 2700 randomised trials were registered. 1173 trials were on a surgical population and of these, 414 trials were studying surgery. Only 9.4% (39/414) of surgical trials were in emergency surgery. The proportion of trials successfully published did not significantly differ between emergency and elective surgery (0.46 vs 0.52; mean difference (MD) −0.06, 95% CI −0.24 to 0.12). Unpublished emergency surgical trials were statistically equally likely to be terminated early compared with elective trials (0.33 vs 0.16; MD −0.18, 95% CI −0.06 to 0.41). Low accrual accounted for a similar majority in both groups (0.43 vs 0.46; MD −0.04, 95% CI −0.48 to 0.41). Unpublished trials in both groups were statistically equally likely to still be planning publication (0.52 vs 0.71; MD −0.18, 95% CI −0.43 to 0.07).

Conclusion Fewer RCTs are registered in emergency than elective surgery. Once trials are registered both groups are equally likely to be published.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere021700
Number of pages6
JournalBMJ Open
Volume8
Issue number7
Early online date7 Jul 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2018

Structured keywords

  • Centre for Surgical Research

Keywords

  • emergency
  • surgery

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Registration and publication of emergency and elective randomised controlled trials in surgery: A cohort study from trial registries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this