Abstract
Objective
The study aims to explore the use of regression discontinuity analysis (RDA) to examine effects of prescription of statins on total cholesterol and adverse outcomes (type 2 diabetes, rhabdomyolysis and myopathy, myalgia and myositis, liver disease, CVD and mortality).
Study Design and Setting
We conducted a prospective cohort study using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink including patients with QRISK scores of 10-30 in 2010-2013 who were last followed-up in October 2016. Comparing patients with QRISK>20 and QRISK<20, we explored RDA assumptions, provided proof of concept analyses (total cholesterol as outcome), and investigated the effect of statins prescription on adverse outcomes.
Results
RDA confirmed statin prescription reduced total cholesterol (Mean difference (MD) -1.33 mmol/l, 95%Confidence Interval (CI) -1.93 to -0.73). RDA provided little evidence for adverse effects on diabetes, myalgia and myositis, liver disease, CVD, or mortality. The RDA analysis findings are similar to RCT results. Findings from non-RDA analysis agree with published observational studies.
Conclusions
RDA can be used with large routine clinical datasets to provide evidence on effects of medications which are prescribed according to a threshold. Testable RDA assumptions were satisfied, but confidence intervals were wide, partly due to the low compliance with the prescribing threshold.
The study aims to explore the use of regression discontinuity analysis (RDA) to examine effects of prescription of statins on total cholesterol and adverse outcomes (type 2 diabetes, rhabdomyolysis and myopathy, myalgia and myositis, liver disease, CVD and mortality).
Study Design and Setting
We conducted a prospective cohort study using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink including patients with QRISK scores of 10-30 in 2010-2013 who were last followed-up in October 2016. Comparing patients with QRISK>20 and QRISK<20, we explored RDA assumptions, provided proof of concept analyses (total cholesterol as outcome), and investigated the effect of statins prescription on adverse outcomes.
Results
RDA confirmed statin prescription reduced total cholesterol (Mean difference (MD) -1.33 mmol/l, 95%Confidence Interval (CI) -1.93 to -0.73). RDA provided little evidence for adverse effects on diabetes, myalgia and myositis, liver disease, CVD, or mortality. The RDA analysis findings are similar to RCT results. Findings from non-RDA analysis agree with published observational studies.
Conclusions
RDA can be used with large routine clinical datasets to provide evidence on effects of medications which are prescribed according to a threshold. Testable RDA assumptions were satisfied, but confidence intervals were wide, partly due to the low compliance with the prescribing threshold.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 121-131 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | Journal of Clinical Epidemiology |
Volume | 141 |
Early online date | 12 Oct 2021 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 12 Oct 2021 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:Funding statement: This research was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration West (ARC West) at University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust (core NIHR infrastructure funded: NIHR200181). KT works in the MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit which receives funding from the UK Medical Research Council and the University of Bristol (MC_UU_00011/3). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors
Keywords
- Regression discontinuity analysis
- statins
- cardiovascular disease
- QRISK score
- epidemiology
- health service research